BAC vs WFC
Bank of America and Wells Fargo, both Financial Services
Bank of America is the larger company at $399B against $252B. On trailing earnings WFC is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 12.8 against 14.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year BAC returned +36% against +16% for WFC. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts WFC ahead, 6/10 against 3/10.
| Figure | BAC | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $62.39 | $87.97 |
| Market cap | $399B | $252B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 14.4 | 12.8 |
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| 1-year return | +36% | +16% |
| 5-year return | +70% | +99% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Bank of America
Revenue of $32B in Q2 2026, net income $9.1B.
Wells Fargo
Revenue of $23B in Q2 2026, net income $6.4B. Its largest reported line is Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service, 44% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.