ARM vs MU
Arm Holdings plc and Micron Technology, both Technology
Micron Technology is the larger company at $996B against $223B. On trailing earnings MU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 11.8 against 214.0, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MU returned +335% against +23% for ARM. The RyuScore puts MU ahead, 82 against 58 out of 100.
| Figure | ARM | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $210 | $880 |
| Market cap | $223B | $996B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 214.0 | 11.8 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 0.1% |
| 1-year return | +23% | +335% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +1202% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 58/100 | 82/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Arm Holdings plc
Revenue of $1.3B in Q1 2027, net income $270M.
Micron Technology
Revenue of $54B in Q4 2026, net income $38B. Its largest reported line is CMBU, 33% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.