BEBloom Energy Corporation

$193.43+68% 1Y

Is the price fair?

Fair

Neither cheap nor expensive: modest expectations priced in, but rich vs its sector.

1 good, 1 to watch, 1 without data
What the price assumes~+31% a year

Priced for ~31% a year FCF growth. The price demands less than its three-year revenue growth of 39% a year, expectations look modest.

Vs sector (EV/EBIT)100.8×

Sector median 21.2× across 246 covered peers. EV/EBIT counts debt as part of the price, so a cash-rich and a borrowed company can be compared on the same footing.

All from derived, as of Sep 30, 2026.

Against the whole market›

Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.

FCF yieldbottom 3% of the market

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What BE's price assumes

Bloom Energy Corporation has no trailing P/E on file, so the price is measured against sales instead: 14.9× revenue.

14.9

Price / sales · no trailing P/E on file: measured against sales instead

Free cash flow yield
0.76%

Free cash flow yield · Electrical Equipment & Parts median 3.9%

Growth the price implies
+31%

Growth the price implies · The price pays for +31% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; revenue has grown 39% a year over the last three.

Price / book
29.6

Price / book · today's price, trailing year to Sep 30, 2026

Details›
Price / booktoday's price, trailing year to Sep 30, 2026
29.6
EV / EBITtoday's price, trailing year to Sep 30, 2026
101
EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Sep 30, 2026
14.9
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
$437M
Market capitalisation295.7 million shares, counted Oct 19, 2026
$57.2B
3-year revenue growth
+39%

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

What is it worth?

Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.