CAVACAVA Group, Inc.
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though rich vs its sector.
Priced for ~31% a year FCF growth. Roughly in line with its three-year revenue growth of 29% a year.
Sector median 15.0× across 156 covered peers. EV/EBIT counts debt as part of the price, so a cash-rich and a borrowed company can be compared on the same footing.
All from derived, as of Jul 12, 2026.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What CAVA's price assumes
CAVA Group, Inc. trades at 97.3× earnings against 28.5× for the median Restaurants name, more expensive than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Restaurants median 28.5 · 3.41× the median: the market pays up for this one
- Price / sales
- 4.55
Price / sales · today's price, trailing year to Jul 12, 2026
- Free cash flow yield
- 0.78%
Free cash flow yield · Restaurants median 4.5%
- Growth the price implies
- +31%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for +31% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; revenue has grown 29% a year over the last three.
Details›
- Price / booktoday's price, trailing year to Jul 12, 2026
- 7.43
- EV / EBITtoday's price, trailing year to Jul 12, 2026
- 82.8
- EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Jul 12, 2026
- 4.34
- Consumer Cyclical median P/E317 names
- 18.0
- Restaurants median P/E30 names
- 28.5
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $49M
- Market capitalisation116.8 million shares, counted Aug 4, 2026
- $6.25B
- 3-year revenue growth
- +29%
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
What is it worth?
Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.
Against its own past
Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.