CIXCompX International Inc.

$35.84+60% 1Y

Is the price fair?

Fair

Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though at the top of its own P/E range.

1 to watch, 2 without data
What the price assumes~+6% a yearderived · Jun 30, 2026

Priced for ~6% a year FCF growth. Moderate growth expectations are priced in.

Vs its own P/E rangedearest in 37 quartersderived

Expensive vs its own history: P/E 20.0 vs a 10.3 median over 37 quarters (+94% vs median).

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What CIX's price assumes

CompX International Inc. trades at 20.0× earnings against 24.2× for the median Security & Protection Services name, cheaper than its own group.

20.0

Trailing P/E · Security & Protection Services median 24.2 · cheaper than the typical name in its group

Price / sales
1.90

Price / sales · as of 2026-Q2

Free cash flow yield
4.8%

Free cash flow yield · Security & Protection Services median 4.9%

Growth the price implies
+6.2%

Growth the price implies · The price pays for +6.2% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered −2.9% a year over the last three.

Details›
Price / bookas of 2026-Q2
2.12
Industrials median P/E434 names
26.2
Security & Protection Services median P/E11 names
24.2
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
$21M
Market capitalisation12.3 million shares, counted Jul 30, 2026
$442M
3-year revenue growth
+0.25%
3-year free cash flow growth
−2.9%
What the market has paid for these earnings: 37 quarters of its own multiple × $1.79 of trailing earnings per share
MethodPer share
Its own P/E history, lower quartile$14.18
Its own P/E history, median$18.45
Its own P/E history, upper quartile$23.49
52-week range$19.79 – $39.67
Today$35.84

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

What is it worth?

Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.