GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
Is the price fair?
A demanding price: priced for +12% a year vs −6% a year delivered and rich vs its sector.
Priced for ~12% a year FCF growth. The price already bakes in strong, sustained growth.
Sector median 29.4× across 209 covered peers. EV/EBIT counts debt as part of the price, so a cash-rich and a borrowed company can be compared on the same footing.
All from derived, as of Dec 31, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What GFS's price assumes
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. trades at 27.9× earnings against 69.7× for the median Semiconductors name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Semiconductors median 69.7 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 4.84
Price / sales · today's price, trailing year to Dec 31, 2025
- Free cash flow yield
- 3.1%
Free cash flow yield · Semiconductors median 2.1%
- Growth the price implies
- +12%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for +12% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; revenue has shrunk 5.7% a year over the last three.
Details›
- Price / booktoday's price, trailing year to Dec 31, 2025
- 2.76
- EV / EBITtoday's price, trailing year to Dec 31, 2025
- 40.4
- EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Dec 31, 2025
- 4.74
- Technology median P/E450 names
- 34.1
- Semiconductors median P/E52 names
- 69.7
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $1.01B
- Market capitalisation741.2 million shares, counted Dec 31, 2025
- $32.9B
- 3-year revenue growth
- −5.7%
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
What is it worth?
Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.
Against its own past
Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.