GTXGarrett Motion Inc.
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: modest expectations priced in, but at the top of its own P/E range.
Priced for a decline (~−2% a year). Little growth is priced in even as revenue fell 1% a year over three years, potential value, or a value trap.
Expensive vs its own history: P/E 11.8 vs a 9.3 median over 18 quarters (+27% vs median).
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What GTX's price assumes
Garrett Motion Inc. trades at 11.8× earnings against 18.1× for the median Auto Parts name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Auto Parts median 18.1 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 1.07
Price / sales · today's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- Free cash flow yield
- 9.1%
Free cash flow yield · Auto Parts median 7.7%
- Growth the price implies
- −2.3%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for −2.3% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered −1.5% a year over the last three.
Details›
- EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- 1.39
- Consumer Cyclical median P/E317 names
- 18.0
- Auto Parts median P/E35 names
- 18.1
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $365M
- Market capitalisation186.5 million shares, counted Jul 24, 2026
- $4.02B
- 3-year revenue growth
- −0.61%
- 3-year free cash flow growth
- −1.5%
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| Its own P/E history, lower quartile | $12.73 |
| Its own P/E history, median | $16.92 |
| Its own P/E history, upper quartile | $20.58 |
| 52-week range | $12.36 – $36.21 |
| Today | $21.55 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
What is it worth?
Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.
Against its own past
Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.