$117.43+62% 1Y
Latest close: a new 52-week highOct 23, 2026what changed →

Is the price fair?

Fair

Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though modest expectations priced in.

1 good, 1 neutral, 1 without data
What the price assumes~+1% a yearderived · Jun 28, 2026

Priced for ~1% a year FCF growth. The price bakes in little to no growth.

Vs its own P/E rangemid-range for this companyderived

In its normal range: P/E 21.0 vs a 21.5 median over 28 quarters (−3% vs median).

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What HAS's price assumes

Hasbro trades at 21.0× earnings against 21.9× for the median Leisure name, cheaper than its own group.

21.0

Trailing P/E · Leisure median 21.9 · cheaper than the typical name in its group

Free cash flow yield
7.3%

Free cash flow yield · Leisure median 7.3%

Growth the price implies
+0.57%

Growth the price implies · What free cash flow would have to do every year for a decade to justify today's price, discounted at 9.0%.

Price / book
16.7

Price / book · as of 2026-Q2

Details›
Price / bookas of 2026-Q2
16.7
EV / EBITas of 2026-Q2
12.8
Consumer Cyclical median P/E317 names
18.0
Leisure median P/E17 names
21.9
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
$1.21B
Market capitalisation141.0 million shares, counted Jul 20, 2026
$16.6B
What the market has paid for these earnings: 28 quarters of its own multiple × $5.59 of trailing earnings per share
MethodPer share
Its own P/E history, lower quartile$102.74
Its own P/E history, median$120.46
Its own P/E history, upper quartile$161.02
52-week range$73.00 – $117.43
Today$117.43

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

What is it worth?

Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.