IRMIron Mountain

$109.96+6.6% 1Y

Is the price fair?

Watch

At the top of its own P/E range. That is the only one of 3 checks this filer's data supports, so take it as a single data point rather than a settled answer.

1 to watch, 2 without data
Vs its own P/E rangedearer than 77% of its own historyderived

Expensive vs its own history: P/E 78.5 vs a 33.5 median over 39 quarters (+135% vs median).

Against the whole market›

Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.

P/E (valuation)bottom 7% of the market

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What IRM's price assumes

Iron Mountain trades at 78.5× earnings against 25.9× for the median REIT - Specialty name, more expensive than its own group.

78.5

Trailing P/E · REIT - Specialty median 25.9 · 3.03× the median: the market pays up for this one

Price / sales
5.01

Price / sales · as of 2026-Q2

EV / sales
7.27

EV / sales

Details›
EV / EBITas of 2026-Q2
38.8
EV / salesas of 2026-Q2
7.27
Real Estate median P/E130 names
26.0
REIT - Specialty median P/E15 names
25.9
Market capitalisation297.7 million shares, counted Jul 24, 2026
$32.7B
IRM has re-rated away from its own history, so multiplying the old multiple by today's earnings prices a full reversal, not the business
MethodPer share
What its own history would implynot meaningful, 78.5× today against a 33.5× median
52-week range$77.69 – $133.06
Today$109.96

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.