MAMAMama's Creations, Inc.

$12.82+21% 1Y

Is the price fair?

Fair

Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though modest expectations priced in.

1 good, 1 neutral, 1 without data
What the price assumes~+13% a yearderived · Jul 31, 2026

Priced for ~13% a year FCF growth. The price demands less than its three-year revenue growth of 29% a year, expectations look modest.

Vs its own P/E rangemid-range for this companyderived

In its normal range: P/E 75.4 vs a 60.0 median over 17 quarters (+26% vs median).

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What MAMA's price assumes

Mama's Creations, Inc. trades at 75.4× earnings against 15.2× for the median Packaged Foods name, more expensive than its own group.

75.4

Trailing P/E · Packaged Foods median 15.2 · 4.98× the median: the market pays up for this one

Price / sales
4.00

Price / sales · as of 2026-Q3

Free cash flow yield
2.9%

Free cash flow yield · Packaged Foods median 7.8%

Growth the price implies
+13%

Growth the price implies · The price pays for +13% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered +29% a year over the last three.

Details›
Price / bookas of 2026-Q3
4.98
Consumer Defensive median P/E140 names
21.7
Packaged Foods median P/E37 names
15.2
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
$17M
Market capitalisation47.1 million shares, counted Sep 2, 2026
$604M
3-year revenue growth
+29%
3-year free cash flow growth
+29%
What the market has paid for these earnings: 17 quarters of its own multiple × $0.17 of trailing earnings per share
MethodPer share
Its own P/E history, lower quartile$4.73
Its own P/E history, median$10.20
Its own P/E history, upper quartile$15.83
52-week range$10.03 – $20.66
Today$12.82

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

What is it worth?

Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.