MTXMinerals Technologies Inc.

$62.91+6.2% 1Y

Is the price fair?

Fair

Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though modest expectations priced in.

1 good, 1 neutral, 1 without data
What the price assumes~+3% a yearderived · Jul 5, 2026

Priced for ~3% a year FCF growth. The price bakes in little to no growth.

Vs its own P/E rangemid-range for this companyderived

In its normal range: P/E 13.4 vs a 15.2 median over 36 quarters (−12% vs median).

Against the whole market›

Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.

FCF yieldmiddle of the market

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What MTX's price assumes

Today's price asks for 2.9% free cash flow growth a year; over the last three years Minerals Technologies Inc. delivered +24%, so the price asks for less than the record.

0.91

Price / sales · no P/E: the last twelve months did not end in a profit

Free cash flow yield
6.1%

Free cash flow yield · Specialty Chemicals median 4.8%

Growth the price implies
+2.9%

Growth the price implies · The price pays for +2.9% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered +24% a year over the last three.

Price / book
1.27

Price / book · today's price, trailing year to Jul 5, 2026

Details›
Price / booktoday's price, trailing year to Jul 5, 2026
1.27
EV / EBIToperating margin −1.3%: the multiple describes the denominator
not meaningful
EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Jul 5, 2026
1.20
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
$120M
Market capitalisation31.1 million shares, counted Jul 22, 2026
$1.96B
3-year revenue growth
0.00%
3-year free cash flow growth
+24%

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

What is it worth?

Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.