NATHNathan's Famous, Inc.

$102.03-3.7% 1Y

Is the price fair?

Fair

Neither cheap nor expensive: nothing decisive, though at the top of its own P/E range.

1 to watch, 1 neutral, 1 without data
What the price assumes~+7% a yearderived · Jun 28, 2026

Priced for ~7% a year FCF growth. Roughly in line with its three-year revenue growth of 8% a year.

Vs its own P/E rangedearer than 75% of its own historyderived

Expensive vs its own history: P/E 21.1 vs a 15.6 median over 40 quarters (+35% vs median).

Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.

What NATH's price assumes

Nathan's Famous, Inc. trades at 21.1× earnings against 28.5× for the median Restaurants name, cheaper than its own group.

21.1

Trailing P/E · Restaurants median 28.5 · cheaper than the typical name in its group

Price / sales
2.48

Price / sales · as of 2026-Q2

Free cash flow yield
4.6%

Free cash flow yield · Restaurants median 4.5%

Growth the price implies
+6.9%

Growth the price implies · The price pays for +6.9% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered −2.8% a year over the last three.

Details›
EV / EBITas of 2026-Q2
14.8
EV / salesas of 2026-Q2
2.62
Consumer Cyclical median P/E317 names
18.0
Restaurants median P/E30 names
28.5
Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
$19M
Market capitalisation4.1 million shares, counted Aug 3, 2026
$418M
3-year revenue growth
+8.3%
3-year free cash flow growth
−2.8%
What the market has paid for these earnings: 40 quarters of its own multiple × $4.83 of trailing earnings per share
MethodPer share
Its own P/E history, lower quartile$65.92
Its own P/E history, median$75.43
Its own P/E history, upper quartile$101.94
52-week range$88.98 – $105.88
Today$102.03

Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.

What is it worth?

Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.

Against its own past

Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.