REPXRiley Exploration Permian, Inc.
Is the price fair?
Neither cheap nor expensive: modest expectations priced in, but at the top of its own P/E range.
Priced for a decline (~−0% a year). The price demands less than its three-year revenue growth of 13% a year, expectations look modest.
Expensive vs its own history: P/E 9.8 vs a 5.8 median over 21 quarters (+67% vs median).
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What REPX's price assumes
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. trades at 9.78× earnings against 11.4× for the median Oil & Gas E&P name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Oil & Gas E&P median 11.4 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 1.45
Price / sales · as of 2026-Q2
- Free cash flow yield
- 7.8%
Free cash flow yield · Oil & Gas E&P median 12%
- Growth the price implies
- −0.29%
Growth the price implies · The price pays for −0.29% free cash flow growth a year for a decade; the business has delivered +38% a year over the last three.
Details›
- Price / bookas of 2026-Q2
- 1.10
- EV / EBITas of 2026-Q2
- 5.20
- EV / salesas of 2026-Q2
- 2.00
- Energy median P/E157 names
- 17.3
- Oil & Gas E&P median P/E44 names
- 11.4
- Free cash flow, trailing twelve months
- $94M
- Market capitalisation22.2 million shares, counted Aug 3, 2026
- $1.20B
- 3-year revenue growth
- +13%
- 3-year free cash flow growth
- +38%
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| Its own P/E history, lower quartile | $23.66 |
| Its own P/E history, median | $32.31 |
| Its own P/E history, upper quartile | $44.13 |
| 52-week range | $23.65 – $54.11 |
| Today | $54.11 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
What is it worth?
Today's price against what its own multiples, its cash flow and your growth assumption say it is worth.
Against its own past
Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.