RUNSunrun Inc.
Is the price fair?
The yardsticks disagree: cheap against its own 5-year P/E range (0th percentile) but the cash-flow math implies demanding growth. Treat as fair, not cheap.
Cheap vs its own history: P/E 5.1 vs a 11.0 median over 19 quarters (−53% vs median).
Sector median 29.4× across 209 covered peers. EV/EBIT counts debt as part of the price, so a cash-rich and a borrowed company can be compared on the same footing.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. The growth-implied estimate assumes a fixed discount rate; capital-heavy sectors look structurally rich on it.
What RUN's price assumes
Sunrun Inc. trades at 5.11× earnings against 20.4× for the median Solar name, cheaper than its own group.
Trailing P/E · Solar median 20.4 · cheaper than the typical name in its group
- Price / sales
- 0.52
Price / sales · today's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- Price / book
- 0.52
Price / book · today's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- EV / sales
- 4.56
EV / sales
Details›
- Price / booktoday's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- 0.52
- EV / EBIToperating margin 2.7%: the multiple describes the denominator
- not meaningful
- EV / salestoday's price, trailing year to Jun 30, 2026
- 4.56
- Technology median P/E450 names
- 34.1
- Solar median P/E9 names
- 20.4
- Market capitalisation240.8 million shares, counted Jul 31, 2026
- $1.82B
| Method | Per share |
|---|---|
| What its own history would imply | not meaningful, 5.11× today against a 11.0× median |
| 52-week range | $6.89 – $21.41 |
| Today | $7.57 |
Multiples from SEC filings and end-of-day closes; implied growth from a reverse discounted cash flow. Group medians across the names Ryufin tracks.
Against its own past
Its multiples now against their own history, and how much of the price move came from earnings rather than the multiple.